Long one - some of the highpoints
From Zein-o-din, it was a long drive to Parsagadae, over dry, bare country, which was a little greener as we entered Fars - Persia proper. Parsagadae stands in a wide, flat, fertile, irrigated plain, which contrasts sharply with the dry mountains all around. Think of the irrigated flatlands and the scarp at Bacchus Marsh, though the Parsagadae plain is much wider and the mountains much taller and rougher.
The buildings here are due to Cyrus the Great, who between 560BC and 530BC conquered most of the known world, and took Persia from a country district to world empire. His tomb stands alone, and is much bigger than it looks in photographs. A stepped base perhaps 50 feet by 40 and 15 feet high supports a small stone building like a house, about 20 feet high. It has minimal ornamentation, is made of a light-coloured local limestone, and has worn fairly well. As far as I can tell, it is the only one of its kind.
Half a mile away are the remains of a ceremonial palace. It has a columned hall, perhaps 50 feet on a side, with a pair of loggias in front. The columns are tall but not fluted, and stand on bases of black and white limestone. Very little sculpture seems to have been used, just a few reliefs in the doorways, which look like Assyrian workmanship, and may have shown a bull-human composite creature, but too much of them has been lost to be sure. A smaller hall a little way off is similar, but simpler, and may have been a waiting room. No domestic buildings are to be seen: they would have been mud-brick, as would the walls of the ceremonial buildings. The buildings are not raised above the plain, but they stand on an imperceptible natural rise in the plain: you can see more or less to the feet of the mountains in every direction. On the inside wall of a gateway is a simple inscription: I am King Cyrus, the Achaemenid.
It is about 65km from Parsagadae to Persepolis. You go from one flat, rich plain to another, via a mountain ridge. On a rocky hill overlooking the plain, and backing onto the mountains, Darius I built a wide platform ughly 35 feet above the plain, and on it he built the first of 3 extravagantly grand palaces, themselves raised above the main platform. The layout of the audience halls is similar to those in the palace at Parsagadae, but the halls are much larger, the columns are much taller, are richly fluted and carved, and have capitals made of pairs of bulls, lions or griffons, and the halls are approached by grand shallow staircases flanked by enormous reliefs showing processions of subject people bringing tribute, Persian and Median lords chattering as they approach the throne, guardsmen looking straight ahead, and the King communing with Ahura Mazda. The style has moved on from the Assyrian to something more humane and inclusive, and just a little humorous. In long inscriptions in three languages, King Darius explains how he was set to rule the world by the grace of Ahura Mazda.
The palace complex was added to by his successors: it is dense and enormous, and must have been overwhelming. It may be the grandest thing you see in a lifetime. But the sculpture is repetitive, and the site is mainly ceremonial, with only a comparatively small area regarded as a royal residence. It seems to have been used for a grand reception, shown in the reliefs, every New Year (21 March - still a national holiday). It may not have been used for much else: we know that the main business of government was carried on in other capitals.
Beside Persepolis, Parsagadae looks simple and austere, although it was splendid, particularly by the standards of the Persia of the day. Cyrus built at ground level, in the middle of his people, and he didn't brag. The difference may be due to evolution: Darius and his successors had grown up in splendour, and may have found Parsagadae too simple for their taste; or it may be function, as it seems that Parsagadae was completed by Darius and used by him to receive the Persian nobility, but not the subject people, from whom the Kings kept a greater distance; or it may reflect different degrees of self-confidence. While each of them contributed enormously to founding a Persian empire, they were very different men.
According to Herodotus and Xenophon, Cyrus was an outstanding general, who mixed and joked with his men, who would follow him anywhere (and they usually did have to follow). As King, he was humane in an age of atrocities, made a conquered enemy his adviser, freed the Israelites from the Babylonian captivity, set the Achaemenid principle of tolerating the religions of the subject peoples, no matter how distasteful they were to him, didn't increase taxes, and generally won people over. Darius I, on the other hand, was more remote and came to the throne as the result of a coup, the rights and wrongs of which are still unclear. Perhaps he needed to distance himself even from the Persians, and to assert the divine right to rule. The Persian lords said that Cyrus was a father, Darius was a merchant, but Xerxes was a king (which shows how wrong you can be: although Cyrus created the empire, Darius made it work, and Xerxes was a failure).
Be that as it may, despite the grandeur of Persepolis, the greatest effect of the day was to feel something of the personality of Cyrus, in the austerity and directness of his palace and his tomb, and in the detail of the old general choosing the highest point in a flat plain.
Next morning, we went over more of Persepolis, visiting the tombs of two of the Achaemenid kings which are cut into the cliffs overlooking the site, and showing Gavin (who skipped it the day before) the palaces of Darius I and Xerxes. After a sustaining melon juice, we went on to a necropolis of four of the Achaemenid kings, in a cliff a few miles away. Near the Achaemenid graves, and in a grotto a few miles away, are eight or so reliefs in a much livelier style showing the triumphs (and approval by Ahura Mazda) of several of the Sassanid kings of the C3rd and 4th AD. You often enough see photos of these reliefs, but out of context: by putting their own memorials next to the graves of the Achaemenids, the Sassanids were asserting the continuity of the Persian empire and its national religion, or at least its revival after the centuries of Parthian rule.
Before going on to Shiraz, we briefly visited the remains of Istakhr, which is only five miles from Persepolis. This was the base from which Ardeshir I launched the overthrow of Parthia, it remained a fortified city to protect the Marvdasht valley throughout the Sassanid centuries, and it resisted the Arabs for several years, before being destroyed, rebuilt and abandoned again. There isn't much left, and some of that obviously belongs to the Islamic period (including columns taken from Persepolis for the mosque), but the guardian and his little boy kindly pointed out the main features and showed us the archaeological map.